Lawyer Meng Fanchen is a senior partner and party branch secretary of Beijing WeiBo Law Firm.

Lawyer Meng once worked as an intellectual property commissioner and engineer in Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. He has been engaged in patents, lawyers and other practical work for more than ten years. He has a solid technical background and legal foundation, and is good at comprehensively applying legal knowledge to provide reasonable and effective solutions for customers to achieve their business goals.Lawyer Meng has provided legal services for Tencent, JD.COM Group, Future TV, China Building Materials, Zhuowang Company,Ruixin Chemical Industry, Peking University Yinghua, Ruidao Medicine, Longyang Weiye, Yang li Ping Company, Shenke Technology and other well-known enterprises, and has been widely recognized by customers.

Many intellectual property and data-related criminal cases represented by lawyer Meng have obtained good defense effects such as bail pending trial or non-prosecution, which effectively safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of the parties.

Lawyer Meng has maintained a good working relationship with the media and universities for a long time. He has been interviewed by the media such as China Business News and Beijing News, and has taught practical courses for lawyers in China University of Political Science and Law, China Communication University, Beijing Institute of Technology, Hebei Finance College and other universities.

Capital Normal University   Master of Science

Beijing Credit Law Research Institute    Intellectual Property Committee    Committee member

Hebei University of Finance       Visiting professor

2021年，荣获北京市海淀区“两优一先”优秀党务工作者、海淀区律师行业“优秀党务工作者”，并受邀参加中国共产党成立100周年大会现场观礼活动

2020年，获评北京市海淀区律师行业“优秀共产党员”

• Future TV Co., Ltd. v Whaley Co.,Ltd.(case of dispute over infringement of the right of information network transmission of works)

• Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. v the State Intellectual Property Office (administrative litigation for trademark application rejected for review)

•Beijing JD.COM Century Information Technology Co., Ltd. v Focus Technology Co., Ltd.(disputes over unfair competition)

•Yunnan Yang Liping Information Technology Development Co., Ltd.v Beijing Xinzheng Yicheng Catering Management Co., Ltd.et al.(cases of copyright infringement and unfair competition )

•Xi 'an Sanming Technology Co., Ltd. v Lenovo (Beijing) Co., Ltd.(dispute over copyright license contract)

•Beijing Medical Kangyou Technology Co., Ltd. v Rizhao Sanqi Medical Hygiene Products Co., Ltd.(case of dispute over  sales contract)

• The business department of Langfang Bank Co., Ltd. v Beijing Zhongrun East Stone Industry Co., Ltd. and Runfeng Investment Group Co., Ltd.(case of dispute over financial loan contract)

•Peking University Yinghua Technology Co., Ltd. v Shenzhen Fabao Fund Investment Management Co., Ltd. et al.(case of infringement of trademark exclusive right)

•Chen Mou v Wu Mou in the second instance (case of counterfeiting registered trademarks ) (Chen obtained insurance and was sentenced to probation; Wu was sentenced to probation in the second instance).

•Shao Mou illegally obtained the data of computer information system (the party was released on bail pending trial, and was exempted from prosecution)

•Beijing Longyang Weiye Technology Co., Ltd. v Xuchang Huacheng New Building Materials Co., Ltd.(dispute over infringement of trademark exclusive right)

•Shaoxing Chitulong Technology Co., Ltd. v Zunyi Hangke Electromechanical Co., Ltd.et al. (Dispute over infringement the invention patent right)

•Beijing University of Chemical Technology v Beijing Zhongjin Ruifeng Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.(dispute over patent rights)

•Hubei Bailiang Electroplating Co., Ltd. v Wuhan Jingtai Electronics Co., Ltd.et al.(dispute over compensation for property damage)

•Qingzhou Yuxin Food Co., Ltd. v China National Intellectual Property Administration and the third party Zhou (administrative dispute over trademark revocation review)

• Huang Mouyue v Hong Mouxin (the second-instance case of the dispute over private lending)